<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (8) TMI 649 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=163278</link>
    <description>Receipts from supplying buses for employee transportation did not amount to a transfer of the right to use the vehicles. Section 3F of the U.P. Trade Tax Act, 1948 applies only where effective possession and control of the goods pass to the recipient. Here, the buses remained under the assessee&#039;s possession and control, and the companies were entitled only to use them for specified transport purposes. The assessee retained responsibility for running expenses, maintenance, drivers, taxes, permits and transit risk. As the agreements did not place the vehicles at the companies&#039; disposal in a manner that transferred effective control, section 3F was not attracted.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 30 Aug 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Apr 2024 11:51:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=350085" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (8) TMI 649 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=163278</link>
      <description>Receipts from supplying buses for employee transportation did not amount to a transfer of the right to use the vehicles. Section 3F of the U.P. Trade Tax Act, 1948 applies only where effective possession and control of the goods pass to the recipient. Here, the buses remained under the assessee&#039;s possession and control, and the companies were entitled only to use them for specified transport purposes. The assessee retained responsibility for running expenses, maintenance, drivers, taxes, permits and transit risk. As the agreements did not place the vehicles at the companies&#039; disposal in a manner that transferred effective control, section 3F was not attracted.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 30 Aug 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=163278</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>