<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (8) TMI 649 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=163278</link>
    <description>The HC upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision, concluding that the agreements between the assessee and the companies did not involve a transfer of the right to use the buses. Consequently, section 3F of the U.P. Trade Tax Act, 1948, was deemed inapplicable. The revision was dismissed, affirming that the assessee retained effective control over the vehicles.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 30 Aug 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Apr 2024 11:51:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=350085" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (8) TMI 649 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=163278</link>
      <description>The HC upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision, concluding that the agreements between the assessee and the companies did not involve a transfer of the right to use the buses. Consequently, section 3F of the U.P. Trade Tax Act, 1948, was deemed inapplicable. The revision was dismissed, affirming that the assessee retained effective control over the vehicles.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 30 Aug 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=163278</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>