<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (10) TMI 572 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=163277</link>
    <description>Liability under section 3F of the U.P. Trade Tax Act, 1948 depends on whether the transaction transfers possession or effective control of the goods to the customer for use. Where buses were supplied only for employee transport at specified times, while the driver and conductor remained with the dealer and custody or control did not pass to the customer, there was no transfer of the right to use goods. The arrangement was therefore not taxable as a transfer of the buses.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 01 Oct 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 27 Mar 2014 18:01:53 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=350084" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (10) TMI 572 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=163277</link>
      <description>Liability under section 3F of the U.P. Trade Tax Act, 1948 depends on whether the transaction transfers possession or effective control of the goods to the customer for use. Where buses were supplied only for employee transport at specified times, while the driver and conductor remained with the dealer and custody or control did not pass to the customer, there was no transfer of the right to use goods. The arrangement was therefore not taxable as a transfer of the buses.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 01 Oct 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=163277</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>