https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=163271 The court disposed of the writ petition concerning the non-release of seized goods by directing the respondent to pay any surplus amount, if realized from the sale of the goods, to the petitioner after adjusting the tax liability. The court also ordered the Commissioner to take action against the erring officials and enhance the security deposit required for dealer registration. The petitioner's request for a writ of mandamus was not granted due to doubts about their bona fides, but the court emphasized the return of any surplus to the rightful owner after settling the tax dues. en-us Mon, 03 Dec 2007 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 18 Dec 2014 14:51:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=163271 The court disposed of the writ petition concerning the non-release of seized goods by directing the respondent to pay any surplus amount, if realized from the sale of the goods, to the petitioner after adjusting the tax liability. The court also ordered the Commissioner to take action against the erring officials and enhance the security deposit required for dealer registration. The petitioner's request for a writ of mandamus was not granted due to doubts about their bona fides, but the court emphasized the return of any surplus to the rightful owner after settling the tax dues. Case-Laws VAT and Sales Tax Mon, 03 Dec 2007 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=163271