<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (11) TMI 564 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=163270</link>
    <description>The writ petition was allowed, and the proceedings initiated against the petitioner based on the alleged breach of conditions under the Sales Tax Incentive Scheme, 1987 were quashed. The court found that the actions taken against the petitioner disregarded the subsequent amendment to the Scheme, rendering them unsustainable. The judgment highlighted the importance of considering amendments to legal frameworks in enforcement actions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 29 Nov 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 19 Sep 2017 09:45:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=350077" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (11) TMI 564 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=163270</link>
      <description>The writ petition was allowed, and the proceedings initiated against the petitioner based on the alleged breach of conditions under the Sales Tax Incentive Scheme, 1987 were quashed. The court found that the actions taken against the petitioner disregarded the subsequent amendment to the Scheme, rendering them unsustainable. The judgment highlighted the importance of considering amendments to legal frameworks in enforcement actions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 29 Nov 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=163270</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>