<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (10) TMI 568 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=163259</link>
    <description>Exemption from trade tax under section 4A of the U.P. Trade Tax Act depends on strict compliance with the applicable notification conditions. The unit&#039;s industrial registration was accepted, and the omission of paint from the original registration did not by itself defeat eligibility, but the decisive requirement was timely application for a term loan within the prescribed cut-off date. Because the relevant term-loan application was made after that date, the claimant failed to satisfy a mandatory condition. In exemption matters, the burden remains on the claimant to prove full compliance, and non-fulfilment of any mandatory requirement disentitles the claimant from relief.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 29 Oct 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Dec 2014 11:39:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=350066" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (10) TMI 568 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=163259</link>
      <description>Exemption from trade tax under section 4A of the U.P. Trade Tax Act depends on strict compliance with the applicable notification conditions. The unit&#039;s industrial registration was accepted, and the omission of paint from the original registration did not by itself defeat eligibility, but the decisive requirement was timely application for a term loan within the prescribed cut-off date. Because the relevant term-loan application was made after that date, the claimant failed to satisfy a mandatory condition. In exemption matters, the burden remains on the claimant to prove full compliance, and non-fulfilment of any mandatory requirement disentitles the claimant from relief.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 29 Oct 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=163259</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>