<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (3) TMI 857 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=245409</link>
    <description>The appeal was allowed by the Tribunal as it found the addition regarding surplus wastage unsustainable. The Assessing Officer&#039;s contradictory findings on wastage and consumption were noted, with the Tribunal emphasizing the proper maintenance of books of account by the assessee. The Tribunal dismissed the appeal against the judgment and order, concluding that no substantial questions of law arose based on the detailed analysis of facts and comparison with earlier decisions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 25 Mar 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 28 Mar 2014 13:31:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=350025" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (3) TMI 857 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=245409</link>
      <description>The appeal was allowed by the Tribunal as it found the addition regarding surplus wastage unsustainable. The Assessing Officer&#039;s contradictory findings on wastage and consumption were noted, with the Tribunal emphasizing the proper maintenance of books of account by the assessee. The Tribunal dismissed the appeal against the judgment and order, concluding that no substantial questions of law arose based on the detailed analysis of facts and comparison with earlier decisions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 25 Mar 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=245409</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>