<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (3) TMI 850 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=245402</link>
    <description>A statutory body&#039;s powers are confined to the functions expressly conferred by its governing statute, and incidental powers cannot be used to create a separate trust or transfer property and management to an entity for activities beyond those functions. On that basis, the trust and collaboration arrangement were held to be beyond the Committee&#039;s authority and ultra vires. Because the trust&#039;s constitution was illegal, registration under section 12A of the Income-tax Act could not be sustained. The text also notes that the trust&#039;s legality had already been adjudicated in civil proceedings and was not open to reappreciation in the appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 04 Mar 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 06 Jun 2014 10:59:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=350018" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (3) TMI 850 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=245402</link>
      <description>A statutory body&#039;s powers are confined to the functions expressly conferred by its governing statute, and incidental powers cannot be used to create a separate trust or transfer property and management to an entity for activities beyond those functions. On that basis, the trust and collaboration arrangement were held to be beyond the Committee&#039;s authority and ultra vires. Because the trust&#039;s constitution was illegal, registration under section 12A of the Income-tax Act could not be sustained. The text also notes that the trust&#039;s legality had already been adjudicated in civil proceedings and was not open to reappreciation in the appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 04 Mar 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=245402</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>