<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (3) TMI 843 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=245395</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the appeal for A.Y. 2001-02 as it was barred by limitation. Orders for A.Ys. 2002-03 and 2003-04 were deemed valid. The Tribunal directed the CIT(A) to adjudicate on merits for A.Ys. 2002-03 and 2003-04, rectifying its earlier order. The assessee&#039;s Miscellaneous Applications were partly allowed for A.Ys. 2002-03 and 2003-04, and dismissed for A.Y. 2001-02. ITA No. 1516/Hyd/2008 was dismissed, while ITA Nos. 314 and 315/Hyd/2012 were partly allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 26 Mar 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 28 Mar 2014 10:57:22 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=350011" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (3) TMI 843 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=245395</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the appeal for A.Y. 2001-02 as it was barred by limitation. Orders for A.Ys. 2002-03 and 2003-04 were deemed valid. The Tribunal directed the CIT(A) to adjudicate on merits for A.Ys. 2002-03 and 2003-04, rectifying its earlier order. The assessee&#039;s Miscellaneous Applications were partly allowed for A.Ys. 2002-03 and 2003-04, and dismissed for A.Y. 2001-02. ITA No. 1516/Hyd/2008 was dismissed, while ITA Nos. 314 and 315/Hyd/2012 were partly allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 26 Mar 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=245395</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>