<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (3) TMI 842 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=245394</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant in a case concerning the interpretation of the investment period under Section 54EC of the Income Tax Act. The Tribunal held that the period of six months for investment should be calculated as six calendar months from the end of the month in which the transfer occurred. Consequently, the appellant&#039;s investment in NHAI bonds on 17th December 2008 was deemed within the permissible period, allowing for the deduction under Section 54EC.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 25 Mar 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Mar 2015 11:54:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=350010" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (3) TMI 842 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=245394</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant in a case concerning the interpretation of the investment period under Section 54EC of the Income Tax Act. The Tribunal held that the period of six months for investment should be calculated as six calendar months from the end of the month in which the transfer occurred. Consequently, the appellant&#039;s investment in NHAI bonds on 17th December 2008 was deemed within the permissible period, allowing for the deduction under Section 54EC.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 25 Mar 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=245394</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>