<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (11) TMI 563 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=163255</link>
    <description>Section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1963 cannot be invoked to extend the ninety-day period for a reference application under section 61 of the Bombay Sales Tax Act, 1959. The Act is treated as a self-contained fiscal code on limitation, and section 59 makes only sections 4 and 12 of the Limitation Act applicable to proceedings under sections 55, 57 and 61. The statutory scheme shows that the legislature intended limited condonation only where expressly provided, so the High Court cannot enlarge the prescribed period beyond that limited scope.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 02 Nov 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Dec 2014 10:51:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=349966" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (11) TMI 563 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=163255</link>
      <description>Section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1963 cannot be invoked to extend the ninety-day period for a reference application under section 61 of the Bombay Sales Tax Act, 1959. The Act is treated as a self-contained fiscal code on limitation, and section 59 makes only sections 4 and 12 of the Limitation Act applicable to proceedings under sections 55, 57 and 61. The statutory scheme shows that the legislature intended limited condonation only where expressly provided, so the High Court cannot enlarge the prescribed period beyond that limited scope.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 02 Nov 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=163255</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>