<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (12) TMI 468 - MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=163246</link>
    <description>A tyre repair business using rubber, chemicals and other materials purchased for the work was treated as carrying on business within the statutory definition of dealer, because the materials were transferred to the tyre owner in the course of executing the repairs. The broader definition under the Madhya Pradesh Commercial Tax Act, 1994 also covered transfers of the right to use goods in the course of business, so the repair materials were taxable goods. Earlier refusals of registration did not create immunity from tax, though they could remain relevant for assessment, interest or penalty. The challenge to the notices and order was rejected.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 07 Dec 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 27 Mar 2014 14:12:22 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=349957" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (12) TMI 468 - MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=163246</link>
      <description>A tyre repair business using rubber, chemicals and other materials purchased for the work was treated as carrying on business within the statutory definition of dealer, because the materials were transferred to the tyre owner in the course of executing the repairs. The broader definition under the Madhya Pradesh Commercial Tax Act, 1994 also covered transfers of the right to use goods in the course of business, so the repair materials were taxable goods. Earlier refusals of registration did not create immunity from tax, though they could remain relevant for assessment, interest or penalty. The challenge to the notices and order was rejected.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 07 Dec 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=163246</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>