<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (12) TMI 425 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=163243</link>
    <description>Section 19B of the Kerala General Sales Tax Act, 1963 permits the assessing authority to reject declared consideration and estimate turnover on the prevailing market price where it is satisfied, after due enquiry and hearing, that goods have been shown at a lower price with a view to evade tax. On the facts stated, the declared sale arrangement was treated as a colourable device by the manufacturer and brand name holder to suppress the real taxable turnover and shift the first-sale structure to avoid tax. The Kerala High Court upheld the assessment, sustained the market-price based estimation, and rejected the challenge to the impugned orders.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 14 Dec 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Dec 2014 13:25:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=349954" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (12) TMI 425 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=163243</link>
      <description>Section 19B of the Kerala General Sales Tax Act, 1963 permits the assessing authority to reject declared consideration and estimate turnover on the prevailing market price where it is satisfied, after due enquiry and hearing, that goods have been shown at a lower price with a view to evade tax. On the facts stated, the declared sale arrangement was treated as a colourable device by the manufacturer and brand name holder to suppress the real taxable turnover and shift the first-sale structure to avoid tax. The Kerala High Court upheld the assessment, sustained the market-price based estimation, and rejected the challenge to the impugned orders.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 14 Dec 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=163243</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>