<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Sound delivery charges shouldn&#039;t be part of goods&#039; assessable value; misdivision by Commissioner (Appeals) into freight, insurance, breakage.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=17890</link>
    <description>Valuation of goods - sound delivery charges recovered by the appellants were not to be added to the assessable value, the bifurcation of the same into freight, insurance and transit breakage, by the Commissioner (Appeals) was not justified - AT</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 27 Mar 2014 10:20:44 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 27 Mar 2014 10:20:44 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=349925" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Sound delivery charges shouldn&#039;t be part of goods&#039; assessable value; misdivision by Commissioner (Appeals) into freight, insurance, breakage.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=17890</link>
      <description>Valuation of goods - sound delivery charges recovered by the appellants were not to be added to the assessable value, the bifurcation of the same into freight, insurance and transit breakage, by the Commissioner (Appeals) was not justified - AT</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 27 Mar 2014 10:20:44 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=17890</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>