https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=245362 The court ruled in favor of the petitioner, finding that the authorities did not adequately consider the relevance of the L.G. Electronics case and other issues raised. The court emphasized the importance of a judicial approach in handling stay applications and the need to address the merits of the case. As a result, the court made the rule absolute in favor of the petitioner and directed that the petitioner shall not seek adjournment of the hearing before the Tribunal. en-us Tue, 04 Mar 2014 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 21 Feb 2015 11:05:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=245362 The court ruled in favor of the petitioner, finding that the authorities did not adequately consider the relevance of the L.G. Electronics case and other issues raised. The court emphasized the importance of a judicial approach in handling stay applications and the need to address the merits of the case. As a result, the court made the rule absolute in favor of the petitioner and directed that the petitioner shall not seek adjournment of the hearing before the Tribunal. Case-Laws Income Tax Tue, 04 Mar 2014 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=245362