https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=245346 The Tribunal decided against constituting a panel of experts to determine machinery characteristics for lift installation, focusing on technical aspects instead. Compliance with the High Court's directive for de novo consideration led to scheduling a two-day hearing for thorough evaluation of evidence and submissions from both parties. The judgment underscores procedural clarity and adherence to higher court directives, emphasizing fair reconsideration without the need for an expert panel. en-us Thu, 27 Feb 2014 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 04 Sep 2014 18:31:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=245346 The Tribunal decided against constituting a panel of experts to determine machinery characteristics for lift installation, focusing on technical aspects instead. Compliance with the High Court's directive for de novo consideration led to scheduling a two-day hearing for thorough evaluation of evidence and submissions from both parties. The judgment underscores procedural clarity and adherence to higher court directives, emphasizing fair reconsideration without the need for an expert panel. Case-Laws Central Excise Thu, 27 Feb 2014 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=245346