<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (3) TMI 789 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=245341</link>
    <description>Polyester staple fibre manufactured in India does not lose its character as Indian-manufactured goods merely because the supplier availed deemed export benefits. For Notification No. 23/2003-C.E., the applicable concessional rate depended on whether the goods cleared into the DTA were produced or manufactured wholly from raw materials produced or manufactured in India; that condition was satisfied here because the assessee used cotton and polyester staple fibre manufactured in India. The term &quot;imported goods&quot; in the explanation could not be equated with goods not produced or manufactured in India. On that basis, the assessee was treated as having a strong prima facie case, and financial hardship supported waiver of pre-deposit and stay of recovery pending appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 23 Feb 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 27 Mar 2014 06:25:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=349880" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (3) TMI 789 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=245341</link>
      <description>Polyester staple fibre manufactured in India does not lose its character as Indian-manufactured goods merely because the supplier availed deemed export benefits. For Notification No. 23/2003-C.E., the applicable concessional rate depended on whether the goods cleared into the DTA were produced or manufactured wholly from raw materials produced or manufactured in India; that condition was satisfied here because the assessee used cotton and polyester staple fibre manufactured in India. The term &quot;imported goods&quot; in the explanation could not be equated with goods not produced or manufactured in India. On that basis, the assessee was treated as having a strong prima facie case, and financial hardship supported waiver of pre-deposit and stay of recovery pending appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 23 Feb 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=245341</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>