<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (3) TMI 782 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=245334</link>
    <description>An assessee who voluntarily opted for compounded tax under the Kerala General Sales Tax Act, 1963 could not withdraw that election in the same assessment year and claim regular assessment under the normal charging provisions. The statutory scheme under Section 7(14) and Rule 30 was treated as an alternative mode of assessment that becomes binding once the dealer&#039;s application is accepted and acted upon. The Court held that the composition arrangement operated for the relevant year and could not be revoked merely because business later slowed or closed. The challenge to regular assessment therefore failed, and the assessee remained bound by the compounded rate for that year.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 12 Dec 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 Apr 2015 09:58:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=349845" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (3) TMI 782 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=245334</link>
      <description>An assessee who voluntarily opted for compounded tax under the Kerala General Sales Tax Act, 1963 could not withdraw that election in the same assessment year and claim regular assessment under the normal charging provisions. The statutory scheme under Section 7(14) and Rule 30 was treated as an alternative mode of assessment that becomes binding once the dealer&#039;s application is accepted and acted upon. The Court held that the composition arrangement operated for the relevant year and could not be revoked merely because business later slowed or closed. The challenge to regular assessment therefore failed, and the assessee remained bound by the compounded rate for that year.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 12 Dec 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=245334</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>