<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (3) TMI 780 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=245332</link>
    <description>The court directed the petitioner to pay a 4% sales tax rate for sandalwood purchased in an auction involving interstate movement. The petitioner issued bank guarantees for the remaining tax amount. Administrative errors led to disputes over the release of bank guarantees, prompting court intervention to rectify the mistakes. Despite legal contentions and disputes over exemptions for overseas and interstate sales, the court dismissed the writ petition due to lack of appeal, prior dismissal of a similar petition, and insufficient documentation supporting interstate sales. The petitioner&#039;s claims were rejected, and the case was closed without costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 13 Nov 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 21 Mar 2014 14:03:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=349841" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (3) TMI 780 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=245332</link>
      <description>The court directed the petitioner to pay a 4% sales tax rate for sandalwood purchased in an auction involving interstate movement. The petitioner issued bank guarantees for the remaining tax amount. Administrative errors led to disputes over the release of bank guarantees, prompting court intervention to rectify the mistakes. Despite legal contentions and disputes over exemptions for overseas and interstate sales, the court dismissed the writ petition due to lack of appeal, prior dismissal of a similar petition, and insufficient documentation supporting interstate sales. The petitioner&#039;s claims were rejected, and the case was closed without costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 13 Nov 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=245332</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>