<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (3) TMI 779 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=245331</link>
    <description>The Court dismissed the writ petition challenging tax liability of a T.V. Cable Operator for the period between 2003 to 2009. The dispute over the number of subscribers attached to the cable network was resolved through surveys conducted by the District Magistrate. Despite appeals and allegations of non-compliance, the State Government&#039;s orders were upheld, emphasizing the petitioner&#039;s failure to challenge provided details. The Court found no merit in the petitioner&#039;s arguments against personal presence during surveys, concluding that the impugned orders were based on a correct appreciation of evidence, leading to the dismissal of the petition and discharge of interim orders.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 09 Jul 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 26 Mar 2014 15:19:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=349840" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (3) TMI 779 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=245331</link>
      <description>The Court dismissed the writ petition challenging tax liability of a T.V. Cable Operator for the period between 2003 to 2009. The dispute over the number of subscribers attached to the cable network was resolved through surveys conducted by the District Magistrate. Despite appeals and allegations of non-compliance, the State Government&#039;s orders were upheld, emphasizing the petitioner&#039;s failure to challenge provided details. The Court found no merit in the petitioner&#039;s arguments against personal presence during surveys, concluding that the impugned orders were based on a correct appreciation of evidence, leading to the dismissal of the petition and discharge of interim orders.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 09 Jul 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=245331</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>