<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (3) TMI 777 - CESTAT MUMBAI (LB)</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=245329</link>
    <description>The tribunal classified renovation/restoration activities under &quot;Commercial or Industrial Construction Service,&quot; imposing service tax liability regardless of the building&#039;s new or old status. The extended limitation period was invoked due to the appellant&#039;s non-compliance with service tax obligations. Penalties under Sections 76, 77, and 78 were upheld, emphasizing non-revenue neutrality and no mens rea requirement for Section 76 penalties. A dissenting member suggested waiving penalties based on the appellant&#039;s belief in non-taxability and revenue&#039;s delayed action. The majority decision affirmed the classification, tax liability, and penalties, modifying penalties post-10/05/2008 to only Section 78.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 17 Jan 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 04 Sep 2015 11:55:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=349837" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (3) TMI 777 - CESTAT MUMBAI (LB)</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=245329</link>
      <description>The tribunal classified renovation/restoration activities under &quot;Commercial or Industrial Construction Service,&quot; imposing service tax liability regardless of the building&#039;s new or old status. The extended limitation period was invoked due to the appellant&#039;s non-compliance with service tax obligations. Penalties under Sections 76, 77, and 78 were upheld, emphasizing non-revenue neutrality and no mens rea requirement for Section 76 penalties. A dissenting member suggested waiving penalties based on the appellant&#039;s belief in non-taxability and revenue&#039;s delayed action. The majority decision affirmed the classification, tax liability, and penalties, modifying penalties post-10/05/2008 to only Section 78.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 17 Jan 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=245329</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>