https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=245324 The High Court dismissed the petition challenging the transfer order under the Income Tax Act from Mumbai to Hyderabad. The court found the petitioner's delay in challenging the transfer order and subsequent acceptance of the transfer through conduct, such as not challenging reassessment notices, as a bar to entertaining the petition. The court refused to exercise its writ jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution of India due to the petitioner's conduct, leading to a refusal to examine the petitioner's grievances on merits. en-us Fri, 28 Feb 2014 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 07 Jun 2014 10:23:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=245324 The High Court dismissed the petition challenging the transfer order under the Income Tax Act from Mumbai to Hyderabad. The court found the petitioner's delay in challenging the transfer order and subsequent acceptance of the transfer through conduct, such as not challenging reassessment notices, as a bar to entertaining the petition. The court refused to exercise its writ jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution of India due to the petitioner's conduct, leading to a refusal to examine the petitioner's grievances on merits. Case-Laws Income Tax Fri, 28 Feb 2014 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=245324