<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (3) TMI 757 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=245309</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ordered the applicants, involved in importing goods, to make a further pre-deposit of Rs.20 lakhs for admission of the appeal within eight weeks. This decision came after considering arguments regarding discrepancies in pricing information provided to Customs and the need for additional deposit amounts. The Tribunal also stayed the collection of the balance dues from the impugned order pending the appeal, emphasizing the importance of compliance with the set deposit amount within the specified timeframe.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 22 Aug 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 26 Mar 2014 09:41:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=349802" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (3) TMI 757 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=245309</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ordered the applicants, involved in importing goods, to make a further pre-deposit of Rs.20 lakhs for admission of the appeal within eight weeks. This decision came after considering arguments regarding discrepancies in pricing information provided to Customs and the need for additional deposit amounts. The Tribunal also stayed the collection of the balance dues from the impugned order pending the appeal, emphasizing the importance of compliance with the set deposit amount within the specified timeframe.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 22 Aug 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=245309</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>