<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (3) TMI 751 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=245303</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, overturning the Order-in-Appeal that denied Cenvat Credit, interest, and imposed a penalty on the appellant. The Tribunal held that an endorsed bill of entry was valid for credit as it only changed the consignee&#039;s name, citing precedents and a High Court ruling. The consignment had reached the intended unit, and the only dispute was the endorsement on the bill of entry. Therefore, the appellant was entitled to credit based on the endorsed bill of entry, and the appeal was allowed with any necessary relief according to the law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 05 Feb 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 26 Mar 2014 08:31:13 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=349796" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (3) TMI 751 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=245303</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, overturning the Order-in-Appeal that denied Cenvat Credit, interest, and imposed a penalty on the appellant. The Tribunal held that an endorsed bill of entry was valid for credit as it only changed the consignee&#039;s name, citing precedents and a High Court ruling. The consignment had reached the intended unit, and the only dispute was the endorsement on the bill of entry. Therefore, the appellant was entitled to credit based on the endorsed bill of entry, and the appeal was allowed with any necessary relief according to the law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 05 Feb 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=245303</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>