<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (3) TMI 750 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=245302</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal filed by M/s. Unique Industrial Handlers Pvt. Ltd., Nashik, holding that the appellant qualified for the benefit of Notification No. 06/2006-CE and Notification No. 12/2012-Cus. The appellant&#039;s supply of Electrically Operated Travelling (EOT) cranes to NTPC under International Competitive Bidding met the conditions for duty exemption. The Tribunal emphasized the similarity with a previous case involving Kent Introl Pvt. Ltd., where a favorable ruling was issued. Consequently, the appellant was granted relief and the stay petition was disposed of, underscoring the importance of meeting specific exemption criteria under the Central Excise Act and Customs Rules.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 03 Feb 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 09 May 2016 11:49:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=349795" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (3) TMI 750 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=245302</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal filed by M/s. Unique Industrial Handlers Pvt. Ltd., Nashik, holding that the appellant qualified for the benefit of Notification No. 06/2006-CE and Notification No. 12/2012-Cus. The appellant&#039;s supply of Electrically Operated Travelling (EOT) cranes to NTPC under International Competitive Bidding met the conditions for duty exemption. The Tribunal emphasized the similarity with a previous case involving Kent Introl Pvt. Ltd., where a favorable ruling was issued. Consequently, the appellant was granted relief and the stay petition was disposed of, underscoring the importance of meeting specific exemption criteria under the Central Excise Act and Customs Rules.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 03 Feb 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=245302</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>