https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=163219 Fishery lease rights arising from a public auction were governed by the tender terms, and a bidder who participated and obtained confirmation of the bid was bound by those conditions. Renewal was not available where the lease was granted for one year and the petitioner failed to comply with the payment schedule by remitting the balance belatedly and in instalments. The court also reiterated that writ jurisdiction under Article 226 does not ordinarily enforce a pure contract, and interference is justified only for arbitrariness, breach of tender conditions, or unfairness. The fresh challenge also failed because the impugned notification had been cancelled and a subsequent auction had already taken place. en-us Fri, 02 Nov 2007 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 20 Dec 2014 10:56:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=163219 Fishery lease rights arising from a public auction were governed by the tender terms, and a bidder who participated and obtained confirmation of the bid was bound by those conditions. Renewal was not available where the lease was granted for one year and the petitioner failed to comply with the payment schedule by remitting the balance belatedly and in instalments. The court also reiterated that writ jurisdiction under Article 226 does not ordinarily enforce a pure contract, and interference is justified only for arbitrariness, breach of tender conditions, or unfairness. The fresh challenge also failed because the impugned notification had been cancelled and a subsequent auction had already taken place. Case-Laws VAT and Sales Tax Fri, 02 Nov 2007 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=163219