<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (1) TMI 519 - WEST BENGAL TAXATION TRIBUNAL</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=163218</link>
    <description>Printing computer papers and stationery to client specifications falls outside the works-contract charging concept where the statutory definition excludes the relevant manufacturing process and the rules specifically exclude making computer stationery from paper from manufacturing. The activity is characterised as conversion of materials into printed stationery under agreement, rather than a works contract merely because materials are used. An unregistered association lacks separate capacity to sue in its own name, but an interested member may pursue proceedings in a representative capacity with Tribunal permission; an admitted application is not defeated where non-compliance causes no prejudice.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 19 Jan 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 25 Mar 2014 17:23:30 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=349775" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (1) TMI 519 - WEST BENGAL TAXATION TRIBUNAL</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=163218</link>
      <description>Printing computer papers and stationery to client specifications falls outside the works-contract charging concept where the statutory definition excludes the relevant manufacturing process and the rules specifically exclude making computer stationery from paper from manufacturing. The activity is characterised as conversion of materials into printed stationery under agreement, rather than a works contract merely because materials are used. An unregistered association lacks separate capacity to sue in its own name, but an interested member may pursue proceedings in a representative capacity with Tribunal permission; an admitted application is not defeated where non-compliance causes no prejudice.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 19 Jan 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=163218</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>