<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (11) TMI 594 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=163216</link>
    <description>The High Court allowed Sales Tax Revision No. 301 of 2004 in part, directing the assessment to be modified by adopting the value of Rs. 3,500 per load for inter-State sales of lime shell for the year 1998-99. Conversely, Sales Tax Revision No. 311 of 2005 was dismissed for the assessment year 1999-2000, as the Tribunal&#039;s decision was upheld due to lack of valid contentions from the petitioner.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 27 Nov 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 25 Mar 2014 17:14:24 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=349773" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (11) TMI 594 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=163216</link>
      <description>The High Court allowed Sales Tax Revision No. 301 of 2004 in part, directing the assessment to be modified by adopting the value of Rs. 3,500 per load for inter-State sales of lime shell for the year 1998-99. Conversely, Sales Tax Revision No. 311 of 2005 was dismissed for the assessment year 1999-2000, as the Tribunal&#039;s decision was upheld due to lack of valid contentions from the petitioner.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 27 Nov 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=163216</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>