<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (2) TMI 835 - MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=163192</link>
    <description>A beneficial industrial tax exemption scheme may validly impose a cut-off date and revised eligibility conditions, and the 31 December 1999 registration requirement was upheld as a permissible classification intended to prevent false claims. However, rejection of eligibility certificate applications without notice, an effective hearing, or a reasoned enquiry was held unsustainable because denial of exemption carries civil consequences. The non-speaking rejection and appellate orders were quashed, and the matters were remitted for fresh consideration after notice, opportunity to explain compliance, and a speaking order.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 26 Feb 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 01 Oct 2016 10:18:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=349749" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (2) TMI 835 - MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=163192</link>
      <description>A beneficial industrial tax exemption scheme may validly impose a cut-off date and revised eligibility conditions, and the 31 December 1999 registration requirement was upheld as a permissible classification intended to prevent false claims. However, rejection of eligibility certificate applications without notice, an effective hearing, or a reasoned enquiry was held unsustainable because denial of exemption carries civil consequences. The non-speaking rejection and appellate orders were quashed, and the matters were remitted for fresh consideration after notice, opportunity to explain compliance, and a speaking order.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 26 Feb 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=163192</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>