https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=163191 Writ relief to restrain recovery of tax arrears was declined where proceedings under the Sick Industrial Companies (Special Provisions) Act, 1985 were already pending before the company court and the appellate authority. The court noted that the Board for Industrial and Financial Reconstruction had sent its opinion for winding up under Section 20(1), the company judge was seized of the matter, and the appellate authority was competent to grant the relief sought. In view of these alternative and appropriate forums, intervention under Article 226 was treated as unnecessary, and the petitioner was left to pursue the available remedy before the proper forum. en-us Mon, 11 Feb 2008 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 12 Dec 2014 14:48:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=163191 Writ relief to restrain recovery of tax arrears was declined where proceedings under the Sick Industrial Companies (Special Provisions) Act, 1985 were already pending before the company court and the appellate authority. The court noted that the Board for Industrial and Financial Reconstruction had sent its opinion for winding up under Section 20(1), the company judge was seized of the matter, and the appellate authority was competent to grant the relief sought. In view of these alternative and appropriate forums, intervention under Article 226 was treated as unnecessary, and the petitioner was left to pursue the available remedy before the proper forum. Case-Laws VAT and Sales Tax Mon, 11 Feb 2008 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=163191