<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (3) TMI 700 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=163184</link>
    <description>Tin containers used for sale of vegetable and edible oil were treated as separately taxable on the strength of binding precedent. The validity of section 3AAAA was recognised, so relief based on its supposed invalidity could not stand and tax on coal purchased from an unregistered dealer was to be quantified under that provision. Refining of mustard oil was treated as manufacture because it produced a new product, attracting tax consequences. In remand proceedings, the assessing authority could not reopen issues beyond the limited remand scope, so the matter concerning soyabean oil seeds was sent back for fresh decision. Levy of interest on late payment of admitted tax was left for reconsideration after the substantive issues were resolved.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 16 Mar 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 25 Mar 2014 12:35:19 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=349741" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (3) TMI 700 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=163184</link>
      <description>Tin containers used for sale of vegetable and edible oil were treated as separately taxable on the strength of binding precedent. The validity of section 3AAAA was recognised, so relief based on its supposed invalidity could not stand and tax on coal purchased from an unregistered dealer was to be quantified under that provision. Refining of mustard oil was treated as manufacture because it produced a new product, attracting tax consequences. In remand proceedings, the assessing authority could not reopen issues beyond the limited remand scope, so the matter concerning soyabean oil seeds was sent back for fresh decision. Levy of interest on late payment of admitted tax was left for reconsideration after the substantive issues were resolved.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 16 Mar 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=163184</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>