<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (3) TMI 698 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=163165</link>
    <description>Penalty under section 10A of the Central Sales Tax Act was held unsustainable where goods purchased against Form C were used for constructing a cold storage in a manner consistent with the dealer&#039;s bona fide understanding of its registration. The court accepted that the registration covered processing of potato, vegetables and fruits, and manufacturing and sale of ice, and treated the non-production of ice as attributable to the incomplete ice chamber. On those facts, the use of the goods was found to be supported by a bona fide belief and to constitute a reasonable excuse under section 10(d), so the penal consequence could not be sustained.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 13 Mar 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 24 Mar 2014 18:44:30 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=349680" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (3) TMI 698 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=163165</link>
      <description>Penalty under section 10A of the Central Sales Tax Act was held unsustainable where goods purchased against Form C were used for constructing a cold storage in a manner consistent with the dealer&#039;s bona fide understanding of its registration. The court accepted that the registration covered processing of potato, vegetables and fruits, and manufacturing and sale of ice, and treated the non-production of ice as attributable to the incomplete ice chamber. On those facts, the use of the goods was found to be supported by a bona fide belief and to constitute a reasonable excuse under section 10(d), so the penal consequence could not be sustained.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 13 Mar 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=163165</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>