<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (1) TMI 836 - HIMACHAL PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=163163</link>
    <description>A statutory first charge for sales tax dues did not prevail over a bank&#039;s prior perfected mortgage, because the State&#039;s preferential claim is generally confined to unsecured creditors and the record did not show completed recovery steps before the bank&#039;s security attached. The bank was therefore entitled to proceed against the mortgaged property. Section 16B of the Himachal Pradesh General Sales Tax Act, 1968, was also held ultra vires to the extent it conflicted with the Banking Companies (Acquisition and Transfer of Undertakings) Act, 1970, since the central enactment&#039;s overriding scheme and non obstante clause protected the bank&#039;s rights in secured assets. The bank&#039;s secured interest was upheld and sale of the property in accordance with law was permitted.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 02 Jan 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Dec 2014 09:44:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=349678" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (1) TMI 836 - HIMACHAL PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=163163</link>
      <description>A statutory first charge for sales tax dues did not prevail over a bank&#039;s prior perfected mortgage, because the State&#039;s preferential claim is generally confined to unsecured creditors and the record did not show completed recovery steps before the bank&#039;s security attached. The bank was therefore entitled to proceed against the mortgaged property. Section 16B of the Himachal Pradesh General Sales Tax Act, 1968, was also held ultra vires to the extent it conflicted with the Banking Companies (Acquisition and Transfer of Undertakings) Act, 1970, since the central enactment&#039;s overriding scheme and non obstante clause protected the bank&#039;s rights in secured assets. The bank&#039;s secured interest was upheld and sale of the property in accordance with law was permitted.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 02 Jan 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=163163</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>