<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (11) TMI 555 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=163156</link>
    <description>Product classification under trade tax law must be decided on evidence using the common parlance test and an ingredient-based examination with reference to authoritative Ayurvedic texts where medicine and cosmetic are undefined. A drug licence under the Drugs and Cosmetics Act is only a relevant circumstance and is not conclusive of classification. The Tribunal&#039;s order was unsustainable because it gave only broad conclusions, failed to assess the evidence in a reasoned manner, and did not explain why the products satisfied the applicable tests. The matter required fresh reconsideration on the evidentiary material and a reasoned finding on classification.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 13 Nov 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Dec 2014 18:08:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=349671" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (11) TMI 555 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=163156</link>
      <description>Product classification under trade tax law must be decided on evidence using the common parlance test and an ingredient-based examination with reference to authoritative Ayurvedic texts where medicine and cosmetic are undefined. A drug licence under the Drugs and Cosmetics Act is only a relevant circumstance and is not conclusive of classification. The Tribunal&#039;s order was unsustainable because it gave only broad conclusions, failed to assess the evidence in a reasoned manner, and did not explain why the products satisfied the applicable tests. The matter required fresh reconsideration on the evidentiary material and a reasoned finding on classification.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 13 Nov 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=163156</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>