<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (8) TMI 669 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=163148</link>
    <description>An estimate of suppressed turnover based mainly on sales noticed on a single inspection day cannot be extended to the full assessment year without a reasonable nexus to material showing year-long suppression; the court therefore reduced the addition in part. Additions sustained on other items were maintained because no legal infirmity was shown in those findings, and the consequential penalty was upheld proportionately to the turnovers retained.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 22 Aug 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 29 Dec 2014 19:52:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=349663" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (8) TMI 669 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=163148</link>
      <description>An estimate of suppressed turnover based mainly on sales noticed on a single inspection day cannot be extended to the full assessment year without a reasonable nexus to material showing year-long suppression; the court therefore reduced the addition in part. Additions sustained on other items were maintained because no legal infirmity was shown in those findings, and the consequential penalty was upheld proportionately to the turnovers retained.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 22 Aug 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=163148</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>