<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (3) TMI 738 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=245290</link>
    <description>A fiscal definition using the word &quot;means&quot; was treated as exhaustive, so pre-operative interest on borrowed funds was held outside additional fixed capital investment under Section 4-A of the Uttar Pradesh Trade Tax Act, with that issue decided for the Revenue. A transformer/C.V.T. installed to regulate voltage and enable operation of factory machinery was treated as plant or equipment necessary for running the unit and therefore within fixed capital investment, with that issue decided for the assessee. The appeal succeeded only on the interest component, while inclusion of the transformer/C.V.T. was upheld.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 28 Jan 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 25 Mar 2014 09:07:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=349655" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (3) TMI 738 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=245290</link>
      <description>A fiscal definition using the word &quot;means&quot; was treated as exhaustive, so pre-operative interest on borrowed funds was held outside additional fixed capital investment under Section 4-A of the Uttar Pradesh Trade Tax Act, with that issue decided for the Revenue. A transformer/C.V.T. installed to regulate voltage and enable operation of factory machinery was treated as plant or equipment necessary for running the unit and therefore within fixed capital investment, with that issue decided for the assessee. The appeal succeeded only on the interest component, while inclusion of the transformer/C.V.T. was upheld.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 28 Jan 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=245290</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>