<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (3) TMI 731 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=245283</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the disallowance of interest and additional expenditure due to exchange fluctuation, applying Section 43A and rejecting the plea for restricted denial of deduction. However, the court ruled in favor of the assessee regarding the allowability of expenditure for the bonus issue. The appeal was allowed in part, with no costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 21 Mar 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 25 Mar 2014 15:15:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=349648" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (3) TMI 731 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=245283</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the disallowance of interest and additional expenditure due to exchange fluctuation, applying Section 43A and rejecting the plea for restricted denial of deduction. However, the court ruled in favor of the assessee regarding the allowability of expenditure for the bonus issue. The appeal was allowed in part, with no costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Mar 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=245283</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>