https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=245262 The Commissioner rejected the Revenue's appeal in a case involving alleged duty evasion by ice cream manufacturers. The decision emphasized the need for corroborative evidence to prove clandestine removal. The Commissioner found the evidence based on sugar consumption, private register, and recovered challans insufficient to support the allegations. The judgment highlights the importance of thorough investigation and tangible proof in establishing charges of duty evasion. en-us Fri, 14 Mar 2014 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 25 Mar 2014 08:32:56 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=245262 The Commissioner rejected the Revenue's appeal in a case involving alleged duty evasion by ice cream manufacturers. The decision emphasized the need for corroborative evidence to prove clandestine removal. The Commissioner found the evidence based on sugar consumption, private register, and recovered challans insufficient to support the allegations. The judgment highlights the importance of thorough investigation and tangible proof in establishing charges of duty evasion. Case-Laws Central Excise Fri, 14 Mar 2014 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=245262