<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (3) TMI 705 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=245257</link>
    <description>The Tribunal directed the appellant to deposit an additional amount within 8 weeks, waived the balance duty, interest, and penalty, and stayed recovery during the appeal. It agreed with the appellant that the final product would be classified under Chapter 49 with nil duty, considering printing and lamination not constituting manufacture. While questioning the extended limitation period, the Tribunal required the deposit based on the appellant&#039;s offer. The decision aimed to provide relief to the appellant while safeguarding the Revenue&#039;s interests.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 03 Dec 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 25 Mar 2014 07:52:33 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=349622" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (3) TMI 705 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=245257</link>
      <description>The Tribunal directed the appellant to deposit an additional amount within 8 weeks, waived the balance duty, interest, and penalty, and stayed recovery during the appeal. It agreed with the appellant that the final product would be classified under Chapter 49 with nil duty, considering printing and lamination not constituting manufacture. While questioning the extended limitation period, the Tribunal required the deposit based on the appellant&#039;s offer. The decision aimed to provide relief to the appellant while safeguarding the Revenue&#039;s interests.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 03 Dec 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=245257</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>