<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (3) TMI 703 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=245255</link>
    <description>Mandatory spares supplied with circuit breakers under an international competitive bidding contract were treated as part of the exempt supply covered by Notification No. 6/2006. Because Rule 6(6)(vii) creates an exception for such international competitive bidding supplies, the mandatory spares also fell within that protection where the purchase orders and bids required them as part of the overall supply obligation. On that basis, reversal of CENVAT credit or payment of 10% of the value of the spares was not required, and the demand was held unsustainable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 02 Mar 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 25 Mar 2014 07:51:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=349620" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (3) TMI 703 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=245255</link>
      <description>Mandatory spares supplied with circuit breakers under an international competitive bidding contract were treated as part of the exempt supply covered by Notification No. 6/2006. Because Rule 6(6)(vii) creates an exception for such international competitive bidding supplies, the mandatory spares also fell within that protection where the purchase orders and bids required them as part of the overall supply obligation. On that basis, reversal of CENVAT credit or payment of 10% of the value of the spares was not required, and the demand was held unsustainable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 02 Mar 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=245255</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>