<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (2) TMI 829 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=163140</link>
    <description>Tax liability under the Kerala General Sales Tax Act arose on two separate statutory bases. Branded taxable goods purchased from an exempted manufacturing unit attracted purchase tax under section 5A(1)(c) because the goods were taxable, no tax was paid on the sale, and they were thereafter despatched outside the State. The Court also applied section 5(2B) to branded goods despatched outside Kerala otherwise than by inter-State sale, holding that stock transfer outside the State satisfied the statutory conditions even without a declaration. The appellant&#039;s challenge failed on both issues, and the statutory scheme fastened tax accordingly.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 04 Feb 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Dec 2014 17:49:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=349588" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (2) TMI 829 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=163140</link>
      <description>Tax liability under the Kerala General Sales Tax Act arose on two separate statutory bases. Branded taxable goods purchased from an exempted manufacturing unit attracted purchase tax under section 5A(1)(c) because the goods were taxable, no tax was paid on the sale, and they were thereafter despatched outside the State. The Court also applied section 5(2B) to branded goods despatched outside Kerala otherwise than by inter-State sale, holding that stock transfer outside the State satisfied the statutory conditions even without a declaration. The appellant&#039;s challenge failed on both issues, and the statutory scheme fastened tax accordingly.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 04 Feb 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=163140</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>