<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (6) TMI 554 - UTTARAKHAND HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=163128</link>
    <description>The High Court found in favor of the petitioner in a challenge to the levy of entry tax on imported machines in an industrial area. The court held that the entry tax was not compensatory in nature, citing a previous case where a similar tax was declared ultra vires. The impugned circular was quashed, and the respondents were restrained from collecting entry tax on the imported machines. The court awarded costs to the petitioner based on the lack of evidence supporting the compensatory nature of the tax.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 02 Jun 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 06 Dec 2014 18:17:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=349576" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (6) TMI 554 - UTTARAKHAND HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=163128</link>
      <description>The High Court found in favor of the petitioner in a challenge to the levy of entry tax on imported machines in an industrial area. The court held that the entry tax was not compensatory in nature, citing a previous case where a similar tax was declared ultra vires. The impugned circular was quashed, and the respondents were restrained from collecting entry tax on the imported machines. The court awarded costs to the petitioner based on the lack of evidence supporting the compensatory nature of the tax.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 02 Jun 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=163128</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>