<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (3) TMI 696 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=245244</link>
    <description>The tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, determining that the services provided qualified as export of services under the Export of Service Rules, 2005. Consequently, these services were not subject to service tax in India. The tribunal emphasized that the location of the service recipient, rather than the place of performance, is crucial in determining the export status. The tribunal set aside the impugned order and allowed the appeal, reinforcing the principles of destination-based taxation as established by the Apex Court.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 28 Feb 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 26 Nov 2024 14:50:18 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=349565" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (3) TMI 696 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=245244</link>
      <description>The tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, determining that the services provided qualified as export of services under the Export of Service Rules, 2005. Consequently, these services were not subject to service tax in India. The tribunal emphasized that the location of the service recipient, rather than the place of performance, is crucial in determining the export status. The tribunal set aside the impugned order and allowed the appeal, reinforcing the principles of destination-based taxation as established by the Apex Court.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Feb 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=245244</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>