<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (3) TMI 680 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=245228</link>
    <description>The Tribunal directed the Transfer Pricing Officer (TPO) to re-examine issues, excluding non-comparable comparables and recalculating the arithmetic mean for potential Transfer Pricing adjustments. The appeal was partially allowed, instructing the TPO to consider risk adjustments and other directives provided. The order was pronounced on 21st February 2014.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 21 Feb 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2015 12:22:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=349549" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (3) TMI 680 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=245228</link>
      <description>The Tribunal directed the Transfer Pricing Officer (TPO) to re-examine issues, excluding non-comparable comparables and recalculating the arithmetic mean for potential Transfer Pricing adjustments. The appeal was partially allowed, instructing the TPO to consider risk adjustments and other directives provided. The order was pronounced on 21st February 2014.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Feb 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=245228</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>