<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (3) TMI 675 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=245223</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the lower authorities&#039; decision on penalty and confiscation of imported goods due to missing MRP stickers. The court found no substantial question of law for consideration, affirming the rulings under Section 130 of the Customs Act and emphasizing its limited appellate jurisdiction. The appellant&#039;s challenge to the ex parte determination, illegal search, and seizure was dismissed, with the court reducing fines based on circumstances but ultimately rejecting the appeal without costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 21 Feb 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2014 11:06:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=349542" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (3) TMI 675 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=245223</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the lower authorities&#039; decision on penalty and confiscation of imported goods due to missing MRP stickers. The court found no substantial question of law for consideration, affirming the rulings under Section 130 of the Customs Act and emphasizing its limited appellate jurisdiction. The appellant&#039;s challenge to the ex parte determination, illegal search, and seizure was dismissed, with the court reducing fines based on circumstances but ultimately rejecting the appeal without costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Feb 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=245223</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>