https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=245222 The Court found the conditions imposed by the second respondent for provisional release of goods to be arbitrary and excessive. It directed that the goods be released to the petitioner upon executing a bond for the entire differential duty and providing a bank guarantee representing 30% of the differential duty. The guarantee was to be maintained until the adjudication proceedings and for 8 weeks thereafter. The petitioner agreed to respond to the show cause notice and participate in the adjudication process. The writ petition was disposed of with no costs, modifying the provisional release order accordingly. en-us Mon, 03 Feb 2014 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 24 Mar 2014 14:13:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=245222 The Court found the conditions imposed by the second respondent for provisional release of goods to be arbitrary and excessive. It directed that the goods be released to the petitioner upon executing a bond for the entire differential duty and providing a bank guarantee representing 30% of the differential duty. The guarantee was to be maintained until the adjudication proceedings and for 8 weeks thereafter. The petitioner agreed to respond to the show cause notice and participate in the adjudication process. The writ petition was disposed of with no costs, modifying the provisional release order accordingly. Case-Laws Customs Mon, 03 Feb 2014 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=245222