https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=245216 The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Bangalore, in a judgment by P G Chacko, allowed the appellant's appeal and set aside the impugned order regarding a demand raised under Rule 6(3)(b) of the CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004. The appellant, engaged in sugar and molasses production, faced allegations of clearing bagasse without duty payment. Citing a precedent from the Allahabad High Court, the Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, determining that bagasse was not an "exempted" final product, leading to the appeal's success and the disposal of the stay application in favor of the appellant. en-us Mon, 28 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 26 Aug 2015 15:39:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=245216 The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Bangalore, in a judgment by P G Chacko, allowed the appellant's appeal and set aside the impugned order regarding a demand raised under Rule 6(3)(b) of the CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004. The appellant, engaged in sugar and molasses production, faced allegations of clearing bagasse without duty payment. Citing a precedent from the Allahabad High Court, the Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, determining that bagasse was not an "exempted" final product, leading to the appeal's success and the disposal of the stay application in favor of the appellant. Case-Laws Central Excise Mon, 28 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=245216