https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=245214 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant in a dispute over the valuation for duty liability on job work of iron and steel products for motor vehicle parts under the Central Excise Valuation Rules from 4/2005 to 3/2009. The Tribunal rejected the Revenue's interpretation, finding that the job worker's consumption did not constitute captive consumption, and relied on previous Tribunal decisions to support their decision. The Tribunal directed the appellant to make a pre-deposit within a specified period, with the balance of adjudged dues waived subject to compliance, and recovery stayed during the appeal's pendency. en-us Thu, 24 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 24 Mar 2014 13:58:39 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=245214 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant in a dispute over the valuation for duty liability on job work of iron and steel products for motor vehicle parts under the Central Excise Valuation Rules from 4/2005 to 3/2009. The Tribunal rejected the Revenue's interpretation, finding that the job worker's consumption did not constitute captive consumption, and relied on previous Tribunal decisions to support their decision. The Tribunal directed the appellant to make a pre-deposit within a specified period, with the balance of adjudged dues waived subject to compliance, and recovery stayed during the appeal's pendency. Case-Laws Central Excise Thu, 24 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=245214