<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (3) TMI 664 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=245212</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellants, manufacturers of detergent powder and a whitening product, in a dispute over excise duty assessment. The Tribunal held that the MRP of the whitening product should not be combined with the MRP of the detergent powder for excise duty calculation under Section 4A of the Act. Since the products were not packed together and not sold at separate prices, the Tribunal found no basis for adding the MRP of both products. As a result, the Tribunal waived the pre-deposit requirement and stayed the collection of dues pending appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 23 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 24 Mar 2014 13:57:37 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=349531" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (3) TMI 664 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=245212</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellants, manufacturers of detergent powder and a whitening product, in a dispute over excise duty assessment. The Tribunal held that the MRP of the whitening product should not be combined with the MRP of the detergent powder for excise duty calculation under Section 4A of the Act. Since the products were not packed together and not sold at separate prices, the Tribunal found no basis for adding the MRP of both products. As a result, the Tribunal waived the pre-deposit requirement and stayed the collection of dues pending appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 23 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=245212</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>