https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=163127 The Court affirmed the competence of the Mysore Courts and the conclusiveness of their judgment under Section 13 of the Code of Civil Procedure. It held that the estate devised under the will was not a joint family property and dismissed allegations of bias and violation of natural justice. The Mysore judgment was deemed conclusive on certain properties in Madras but not on immovable properties. The findings of the Mysore High Court on Ramalingam's status and business ownership were upheld, allowing the Madras High Court to decide on immovable properties. en-us Fri, 04 May 1962 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 24 Mar 2014 10:35:58 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=163127 The Court affirmed the competence of the Mysore Courts and the conclusiveness of their judgment under Section 13 of the Code of Civil Procedure. It held that the estate devised under the will was not a joint family property and dismissed allegations of bias and violation of natural justice. The Mysore judgment was deemed conclusive on certain properties in Madras but not on immovable properties. The findings of the Mysore High Court on Ramalingam's status and business ownership were upheld, allowing the Madras High Court to decide on immovable properties. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 04 May 1962 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=163127