<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1962 (5) TMI 25 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=163127</link>
    <description>A foreign judgment is conclusive under section 13 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, when the foreign court had competent jurisdiction over the controversy actually litigated and the matters directly decided bind later proceedings between the same parties. Allegations of bias, denial of hearing, or other natural justice defects must be proved by cogent evidence; mere refusal of adjournment, prior expression of opinion, or social association was insufficient here, so the judgment was not coram non judice. On the evidence, the estate was found to be joint Hindu family property derived from a family nucleus, and the will could not operate to dispose of that property.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 04 May 1962 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 24 Mar 2014 10:35:58 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=349525" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1962 (5) TMI 25 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=163127</link>
      <description>A foreign judgment is conclusive under section 13 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, when the foreign court had competent jurisdiction over the controversy actually litigated and the matters directly decided bind later proceedings between the same parties. Allegations of bias, denial of hearing, or other natural justice defects must be proved by cogent evidence; mere refusal of adjournment, prior expression of opinion, or social association was insufficient here, so the judgment was not coram non judice. On the evidence, the estate was found to be joint Hindu family property derived from a family nucleus, and the will could not operate to dispose of that property.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 04 May 1962 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=163127</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>