<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (9) TMI 555 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=163119</link>
    <description>Contracted passenger transport by buses did not amount to a transfer of right to use goods because the corporation retained possession and control throughout the contract period. The drivers and conductors remained the corporation&#039;s employees, the running expenses were borne by it, and no delivery of the buses to the contracting parties was shown. A transfer of the right to use goods requires delivery of possession or control at some stage, and mere permitted use without such delivery is insufficient. Tax under section 3F of the U.P. Trade Tax Act, 1948 was therefore not payable, and the tax deletion was left undisturbed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 12 Sep 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 22 Mar 2014 12:34:04 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=349517" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (9) TMI 555 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=163119</link>
      <description>Contracted passenger transport by buses did not amount to a transfer of right to use goods because the corporation retained possession and control throughout the contract period. The drivers and conductors remained the corporation&#039;s employees, the running expenses were borne by it, and no delivery of the buses to the contracting parties was shown. A transfer of the right to use goods requires delivery of possession or control at some stage, and mere permitted use without such delivery is insufficient. Tax under section 3F of the U.P. Trade Tax Act, 1948 was therefore not payable, and the tax deletion was left undisturbed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 12 Sep 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=163119</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>